 |
Our
Promise to You |
- Our injury lawyers have years of
experience successfully representing
clients in personal injury cases.
- There is no charge or obligation
for our review of your injury lawsuit.
- In death and serious injury cases,
we are pleased to visit you where you
live, at no cost, to discuss your legal
rights and answer your questions.
- We have retained vehicle safety experts
who have analyzed the stability of
the Yamaha Rhino. On staff we have
six legal nurse consultants to assist
our attorneys in demonstrating the
extent of injuries our clients have
suffered, and the need for future medical
care.
|
 |
en
español |
 |
Free
Case Evaluation |
 |
Recreational
Vehicle
Safety News |
|
|
|
|
Yamaha Rhino Rollover
Attorney Profile |
 |
|
Richard M. Heimann |
Partner |
San Francisco |
|
Practice Areas Include: |
Antitrust Personal Injury/Torts
Securities and Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bar Information |
|
Admitted to practice in Pennsylvania, 1972; District of Columbia, 1974; California, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, 1974; U.S. Supreme Court, 1980; U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 1980; U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii, 1986. |
|
|
Education |
|
Georgetown University (J.D., 1972), Georgetown Law Journal, 1971-72; University of Florida (B.S.B.A., with honors, 1969). |
|
|
Prior Employment |
|
Mr. Heimann served as Deputy District Attorney and Acting Assistant District Attorney for Tulare County, California, 1974-75; Assistant Public Defender in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1972-74. |
|
|
Awards |
|
"Northern California Super Lawyer," Law & Politics,
2004-2007. |
|
|
Publications & Articles |
|
Panelist, Securities Law Roundtable, California Lawyer, April 200; Co-Author, “Preliminary Issues Regarding Forum Selection, Jurisdiction, and Choice of Law in Class Actions,” December 1999. |
|
|
Litigation Experience |
|
As a private civil law attorney, Mr. Heimann has tried over 30 civil jury cases, including complex cases such as the successful FPI/Agretech and Edsaco securities class action trials. In April 2002 in the Edsaco case,
a federal jury in San Francisco, California returned a $170.7 million
verdict against Edsaco Ltd., which included $165 million in punitive
damages. |
|
|
Member |
|
State Bar of California; Bar Association of San Francisco. |
|
|
|
|
|